Upper
Washita River, Oklahoma
Characteristics
The
Upper Washita River Hydrologic Unit in southwest Oklahoma drains an area of
8260 km2 (827,000 ha). The Washita River is a tributary to the Red River,
flowing into Lake Texoma, the largest reservoir in Oklahoma. Monitoring and
assessment for CEAP will focus on two subwatersheds, (approximately 11-digit
HUC size), the Little Washita River and Fort Cobb Lake watersheds. The region
is sparsely populated with predominantly agricultural land use, consisting of
mixed cropland and grazing land. Localized areas of irrigated cropland exist in
association with water supply from reservoirs or groundwater. The region is
underlain primarily by Permian sandstone, siltstone, and claystone. Both
watersheds receive about 76 cm of precipitation annually, with most of the
precipitation occurring during the spring and fall months.
The
Fort Cobb Lake - Lake Creek subwatershed (78,800 ha) has mixed agricultural
land use, including rangeland/pasture (41%), dryland crops (41%), irrigated
crops (10%), forests (6%), and water (2%). Irrigation in the Fort Cobb Lake
watershed is by center pivot systems on sandy soils, supplied by groundwater.
Cattle grazing, predominantly stocker cattle utilize the range and pasture
lands. Confined swine operations are located in the upper portions of the
watershed. The reservoir provides public water supply, fishing, boating, and
wildlife habitat. Over 80% of the soils in the watershed are fine sandy loams,
with the remaining 17% having loamy and silt loam textures. The 61,000 ha
Little Washita River Experimental Watershed (LWREW) is also a mixed land use
watershed with pastures and grasslands (60 %), cropland (20 %), and
miscellaneous land-use (20 %). There are 45 USDA-funded flood control
structures within the Little Washita River subwatershed. There are 64 defined
soil series in the LWREW, with fine sand, loamy fine sand, fine sandy loam,
loam and silty loams being the predominant textures of the soil surface. In
general, soils with moderate infiltration rates cover approximately 70% of the
watershed.
Environmental Impacts
1.
Sedimentation and nutrient (phosphorous and nitrogen) loading.
2.
Channel instability in some of the tributaries.
3.
Impaired water bodies for municipal water supply, recreation, and fish and
wildlife.
4.
Degradation of wildlife habitat.
Management Practices
1.
Pasture and hay planting (512)
2.
Grassed waterway (412)
3.
Fencing (382)
4.
Use exclusion (472)
5.
Grade stabilization structure (410)
6. Critical
area planting (342)
Research Objectives
General:
The overall goal is to develop better understanding of the integrated
effects of land use, land management (including conservation practices) and
climate variations on hydrologic processes at watershed to regional scales. The
Southern Great Plains is subject to recurring climate extremes, particularly
drought, which slows economic growth mainly due to limited and unreliable water
supplies. Because agriculture dominates land use, conservation and other
agricultural management practices have a large impact on water resources.
Specific:
1.
Quantify hydrologic processes that affect regional surface water supplies as a
basis for development of strategies and methodologies to better meet the water
quantity and quality needs of downstream users.
2.
Determine infiltration, ground water recharge and return flows to ascertain
impacts on ground water supplies And surface/groundwater interactions.
3.
Integrate remote sensing estimates of surface soil water content with other
spatial data sets to monitor and predict root zone soil water content and
availability at regional scales to improve watershed and regional water balance
calculations.
Approaches
World-class
instrumented watershed facilities, state-of-the-art simulation models, field
studies, and remotely sensed data are utilized in this project to address the
three interrelated objectives noted above. Hydrologic data collected between
1961-1985 from various sub-basins within the Upper Washita Watershed are
available for model calibration. Weir sites from prior studies still exist and
could be re-instrumented, if needed and pending landowner approval. Substantial
monitoring of climate and streamflow is supported by ARS, the Oklahoma Mesonet,
and USGS in the LWREW and Fort Cobb watershed. Extensive monitoring was
conducted from 2000 to 2002 by USGS in the Fort Cobb watershed. Beginning in
2005, a bi-weekly cycle of stream water quality measurement will be initiated
by ARS, including: pH, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, salinity, total
dissolved solids, temperature, turbidity, oxygen reduction potential, nitrate
concentration, ammonia concentration, suspended sediment, and phosphorus.
The
Great Plains RC&D will work collaboratively with ARS to contact farmers to
obtain conservation and production management information relevant to the
assessments. The Oklahoma Conservation Commission will conduct a habitat
assessment of selected stream segments.
The
suite of EPIC/APEX/SWAT models will be used in scaling analyses to determine
linkages of conservation practices, soil properties, edge-of-field responses,
and watershed scale responses. The SWAT and SWAT/MOD models will be used for
assessing the impacts of conservation practices on surface and groundwater,
respectively, at the watershed scale. CONCEPTS will be used to assess the role
of stream bank stability and channel processes within the watershed. Land use,
soil, remotely sensed estimates of surface soil water content, and other
spatial data sets will be utilized to produce regional estimates of soil water
content in the root zone. Impacts of conservation practices on soil physical,
biological, and chemical properties will be evaluated collaboratively with the
National Soil Erosion Laboratory. Geohydrologic data will include groundwater
data sets from historic ARS wells, USGS groundwater wells from surrounding
areas, and historical and current stream gages. The historical database
contains data for 34 drill holes, for which 21 were used to monitor ground
water levels within the LWREW. The other 13 drill holes were used for
stratigraphic control. In addition, historical databases from hundreds of
monitoring wells from other experimental watersheds in this region, and in
similar geologic terrain, are also available. Areas within the LWREW and Ft.
Cobb watersheds that have little stratigraphic control will be drilled, cored,
and some will be completed as groundwater monitoring wells to provide insight
in regions where information is scarce.
Selected References
1.
Van Liew, M.W. and Garbrecht, J.D. Hydrologic simulation of the Little Washita
River Experimental Watershed using SWAT. J. Amer. Water Resources Assoc.
39(2):413-426. 2003.
2.
Van Liew, M.W., Arnold, J.G., and Garbrecht, J.D. Hydrologic
simulation on agricultural watersheds: choosing between two models. Trans.
ASAE. 46(6):1539-1551. 2003.
3.
Van Liew, M.W., Garbrecht, J.D., and Arnold, J.G. 2003. Simulation of the
impacts of flood retarding structures on streamflow for a watershed in
Southwestern Oklahoma. J. Soil and Water Cons. 58(6):340-348.
4.
Van Liew, M.W. 2004. Impact of flood retarding structures on simulated
streamflow for various sized watersheds under varying climatic conditions. GIS
and Remote Sensing in Hydrology, Water Resources and Environment (Proceedings
of ICGRHWE held at the Three Gorges Dam, China, September 2003. IAHS Publ.
289:33-40.
Collaborators and Cooperating Agencies and Groups
USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Laboratory, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Geological Survey, Environmental Protection Agency, Oklahoma Climatological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma Conservation Commission, Great Plains RC&D, Local Landowners