An ARS Benchmark Research
Watershed
Characteristics
The watershed is primarily agricultural, with approximately 64% in
cropland and 15% in pasture or forage. Woodlands and wetlands are found on 10%,
while the remaining 11% consist of urban, industrial, farmsteads, airports,
golf courses, and other land uses. Of the cropland, approximately 54% is in
corn, 37% in soybeans, and 9% in wheat. Primary cropping consists of
corn-soybean rotations and varying tillage practices. Cultivation practices in
The topography of the watershed varies from rolling hills in
Hillsdale, Williams, Noble, and Steuben counties to nearly level plains and
closed depressions in DeKalb and Allen counties. The
Soils in the watershed were formed from compacted glacial till.
The predominate soil textures are silt loam, silty clay loam, and clay loam.
Soil associations include Miami-Morley, Morley-Glynwood-Blount, and
Blount-Pewamo. Erosion and over-saturation are the major soil limitations.
Water balance data (1) for Cedar Creek Watershed include: Annual
Rainfall - 39.08 in; annual Runoff - 3.53 in. Hydrological characteristics for
Cedar Creek Watershed include discharge data from 1947-2002 (3): Maximum - 5580
cfs; Minimum – na; Mean - 255 cfs; Median – na.
Environmental Impacts
1. Water Quality: Runoff contaminated with sediments, nutrients
(P, NO3-, NH4+), and pesticides. The
2. Fish and Wildlife Habitat: streams and ditches impacted by
suspended sediments that suppressed primary and secondary productivity.
3. Soil Quality: Changes in carbon sequestration as practices are
implemented
Management Practices
1. Conservation Crop Rotation 328
2. Cover Crop 340
3. Deep Tillage 324
4. Drainage Water Management 554
5. Fence 382
6. Field Border 386
7. Filter Strip 393
8. Grassed Waterway 412
9. Pasture and Hay Planting 512
10.
11. Residue Management 329A and 329B
12. Riparian
13. Subsurface Drainage 606
14. Surface Drainage, Field Ditch 607
15. Surface Drainage, main or Lateral 608
16. Water and
Research Objectives
1. Water Quality: Determine the
impact of voluntary, practical, and scientifically based BMPs on pesticide,
nutrient, and sediment loads in source water on a watershed basis. The ARS
research objective is a part of the Source Water Protection Initiative (SWPI)
being implemented in
2. Modeling: Development of
the spatial/historical database necessary to run the SWAT model uncalibrated,
calibrated and validated for the Cedar Creek watershed and ultimately for the
3. Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) and Soil Quality
Assessment: Determine effects of
different practices on DOC/carbon sequestration.
Approaches
Water Quality: The research is using paired sub watersheds at different scales
within the St. Joseph River Watershed at
Modeling: A network of real-time
weather stations is currently being constructed that will provide input to SWAT
and will provide insights into the spatial variability and uncertainty of
weather input data. Remotely sensed soil moisture data will be used to
characterize drainage patterns at the watershed scale and thus determine
surface soil hydraulic properties over large areas. Data is being gathered from
producers that will provide input information from each tract within the
monitored watersheds regarding management practices and timing.
Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) and Soil Quality Assessment: DOC has been
measured for 2003 and 2004 at each sampling point (Figure 3). Experimentation
is also ongoing regarding the loss of C and N with eroding sediments, and the
possible enrichment of eroding aggregates with labile C and N. In addition,
soil quality sampling is currently being conducted on the small AS1 and AS2
watersheds and will begin in the Upper Big Walnut (
Small Watershed, Field and Plot Scale Experiments: Scientists at the
National Soil Erosion Research laboratory are also designing and implementing
additional experiments at the St Joseph River Watershed to address specific
research issues related to water quality. These research results will help
improve the basic science in watershed hydrology and be used to interpret the
water quality results from monitored sub-watersheds. A list of these research
projects is shown below:
1. Rainfall simulation studies at the field plot scale to quantify
effects tillage on nutrient, pesticide and sediment losses. Tillage treatments
include: conventional no-till, precision-till, and conventional tillage. In
conjunction with the tillage treatment, pesticides studied include atrazine,
metolachlor, glyphosate and aminomethyl-phosphonic acid (AMPA), the primary
metabolite of glyphosate. Runoff samples are also analyzed for: nitrate,
ammonium, total nitrogen, orthophosphate and total phosphorus.
2. Compare the hydrologic response and water quality results from
the controlled field plot rainfall simulation studies to data collected from
monitored subwatersheds (Figure 3) to address the scaling issue in watershed
hydrology.
3. Examine water quality impacts from different surface inlet
designs. In the pothole topography of the St Joe River Watershed, surface
inlets are commonly used to provide drainage of excessive water from
depressions. This rapid surface drainage may carry pollutant-laden runoff to
drainage tiles and ditches. Beginning in 2005, a pair of closed depressions
each draining approximately 3 ha (AD1 and AD2, Figure 3) will be installed with
tile riser (current practice, or control treatment) and blind inlet (proposed
BMP). Special flumes will be installed in the drain line to monitor flow and
water quality. Additional depressional areas will be identified and
instrumented as the research progresses.
4. Evaluate practices to control in-stream transport of nutrients
in managed drainage ditches and potential physical and chemical treatments of
drainage ditch sediments to reduce downstream delivery of nutrients.
Collaborators and Cooperating agencies and groups
St Joseph River Watershed Initiative is a local non-profit organization that cooperates with ARS in
maintaining the water quality sampling sites, preserving the collected samples,
collecting land use and management practice data in the study area and
communicating with land owners and farm operators for the SWPI/CEAP project.
NRCS (State and Field Offices) is
providing technical assistance and program support for identified conservation
practices to be implemented in the watershed.
City of Ft Wayne is analyzing the
weekly grab samples collected from the watershed for pesticides.
America’s Clean Water Federation is coordinating the SWPI Project and assisting the congressional
support.
State and Local Agencies: Soil and
Selected references
1.
2. Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment model, Pandey, S.,
Harbor J., Engel B., A Web-Based Tool to Assess Impacts of Land Use Change.
Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, Annual Conference
Proceedings. 2001.
3. US Geological Survey, Water Resources Data http://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/in/nwis/